I propose the following: External links are considered reference sources and must have factual information. I think most of this article reads as a "how to" guide, and should therefore be moved to Wikibooks and replaced here with a link to the new article. So, it seems that more beef could be added to Chastity belt by condensing Chastity cage , which is poorly-sourced and lacks historical context, and adding it into Chastity belt , which is both much better-sourced and has a decent amount of historical context. Shouldn't something be added about more recent developments, for instance those padlocked trousers being worn by indonesian massage parlor workers to prevent sexual activity? Aielen talk , 7 August UTC. Is it just me, or does Choosing a chastity belt and Purchasing and wearing a chastity belt sound like an ad? This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Mia. Age: 25.
It was apparently used in the ancient Orient.
Adaline. Age: 30.
male chastity belts pictures
I can't seem to get the list up for editing. Okay, I've seen that someone has added an external link to a site with femdom chastity stories, and before we get into another edit war, it's time for us to establish the criteria that external links must meet in order to be posted here. It seems to me that Chastity cage fits that description, but is primarily intended for males. Beyond the first few "break in" weeks, you don't notice this so much. Quite frankly, if you don't like what you see, simply click away - don't stop to ponitificate.